11 Ocak 2012 Çarşamba







.." OPiNi O N    t o   SHAKESPE A R E "..........
...w e are touring around;    the concept     ;  " o p i n i ON "   , as far as I can see..
L e t me  m a k e an offer.. to  w h a t  is  " opiniON "      ; i n  ART..
















This  " P a i n t i n g "
is a "response " to PicasSO's  " Michelangelo & the A n g e l "..(or let's say an advenced talk about P i c a s s o 's  Painting " L i f e"..) This painting has an opinion about Picasso's work so there is an opinion i n this painting..
Then , c a n w e  M A K E an other opinion; by  J u s t  changing the direction of this P a i n t i n g..This is an other edge; (side) and this picture is ; an other " P a i n t i n g..

l e t s, take details of these 2 paintings.. 
                                                                                                                       



















then can U say these are , painting  -or point ing-  ,the same " f i g u r e.."
There are two different opiniONs  -2 other paintings-   h e r e;  but, i n    f a c t  , they are quite " the s a m e "..  t   H   i   n  G...So we can say Paintings c a n have  " o t h e r "  P a i n t i n g s   in  them.                                                                                                                                 (How can U put 4 other paintings i n O n e canvas, so turn the canvas to have an other painting, or an o t h e r " p a r t "  from  the T o p i c,  -subject-..just l i k e a simphony has 4 different parts, and every part is an other music..)
....l e t   u s   c o m e  to PicasSO's  Painting G U E R N i C A...I can say; this painting has " p a r t s "  put togather;( o r  combined, -mi x e d- ) SO picasSO; I can say this is a modern painting   - that has 4 parts in it -  ..but  why picasso combined them -added this 4 parts together-  .(this is like, you h a d  4  woman in your life, and U will try to combine them   -put them on a same graund-   to make your life u n i f i e d.. o t h e r w i s e U can not achive U n i t y   a s  a n ARTist..    so picasso lived with some women and  H e had to put them on same ground.H e did not have the chance to take only o n e woman " G A L A "  like, D  a  l  i "   did..
G u e r n i c a;  has  " s i m p l e " and   B A S i C  Things , L i n e s; Language -mode,style-  ,, and only fundamental o b j e c t s  ; to the T o p i C..   If I was to make a woman of my l i f e ,then, I should p i ck  ,basic & fundamental parts o r lines from " 4 woman " that I lived with..I n t e g r a l  was to  be  " One woman " so, I should t a k e  basic  parts made  s i m p l e..to be able to take the " i n t e g r a l "  to  " O n e Woman "   ,only.   .-basic things can b e s i m p  l e;  b e s t  by mathematics; and a r o b o t  can be able to draw only by mathematic programs of it's o w n..s o picasso l i n e s in G u e r n i c a  are as m a d e b a s i c and simple by,  m a t h.-
m y   opiniON ; sa y s;  things are at the s a m e  graund...o f  the T o p i c.. -you can not chance the " concept  of a topic " if U do not want to  -...S O; there is a tie - a bond- between t h i n g s,when  acting in a concept..I can rely ON this ;e n c i r c l e m e  n t  of concept's and ; I can give  freedom to  be 4 other woman, i n O N E..  W h y   4..  4 it should   b e  M o d e r n.. Otherwise freedom can lead U to the shapes that you can not control..M O D E R N i T Y  CONTROLs  U;  not M E..
S o Picasso's; G u e r n i c a;  takes painting to M o d e r n roots o f maths; that were planted in b a s i c " İ n t e g r a l " or " derivative " calculatiONs o f the C a l c u l u s..Picasso tried  to put  S o c i a L T o p i c s into;   f i e l D   o f  math's...T h i n g s have t o be B A S i C, if t h e y  are to b e in the fields of maths;  a p l i c able  to derivatives and i n t e g r a t i ONs..   T h a t  can, or could M A K E solutiONs to arguments,  o r  S o c i AL   P r o b l e m s..   (Conflicts A R E;  N O N  S E N S E, thill t h e n..)
...but I am still " spectic ";   a s   U said  ALAN..ART has to have a magic;  -charm-  not based to , combined or integrating F i e l d s  o f  m a t h e m a t i c s..( but this stlll is a main step " in between "  too..)                                                                                                                                      When it comes to human's DOing ART;  as a part of N A T U R E; -a part that is surrounded by nature-   t h e n N  a t u r e, has to L e a d the way o f DO ing.. n a t u r e of ART has to be M A D E;  or DONE;  by N a t u r e ,  itself, and artist is a  Transmiss i v e...
S  O  ; after PicasSO;  U  must make ART; as  DO ing Something.. then "turned   -4 times-  "    to  see; if  it can   f i g u r e,,new opinions  -of drawings of new f i g u r e s;-     or  it only; p u t s dawn the mathematical roots 4 many o t h e r  " t  r  u  e "  opinions to be said  ON the T O P i c.  to  meaningfull arguments  o n S o c i a l  Science s                                                                                          ..I   a m; very  OBSESSive;   o n this T u r n i n g,  of  the Object,  i  n  A  Painting..(as it w a s  Sculpture's   n a t u r e, gained into Modernity of a painting..)( and I shall accept any painter that can DO Things that can make  "opiniONs ON   " theN E W  F i G U R E S  "   ;when TURNED..( 4 OPiNiONs  -MADE; or D O N E;-   by ART, itself.  as f i g u r i n g, or drawing them n e s t e d..genuine "  o p i n i o n s   "  ; that  c a n be     n e s t e d  in each other  "  ON an OBJECT  "     ; , i n  f a c t..."
if a paintig  i s  A R T i s ti C;    -DONE by ART itself-  then I need  permission ;TO turn the painting..p l e a s e.. but t r a d i t o n of saying " ARTistic " includes; ARCHiTECTURAL (RATiO Architecture)-MATHEMATiCs as " A e s the t i c S.."  these days..(ART is An Animal to me and I am curious about what it shall DO to shape 4 other figures out of ONE OBJECT..And I am the establisher of this " MODE L-Animal "  -that has been Configured by God-  to be planted i n me A S   I am an ARTist..Art is a  p e t, made of human ,in this saying..)


 





so  s a i d; the " female sheep ",     SHAPE;                               tolD Me.S O.  (not P i c as SO ..)     OPEN U'r L e g S -that w a s  my Lips ONCE-   ; Little " sheep "  SO;  WE can  S E E; the DARKness of, " OTHERWORLDs.."in this D a r k..ness..  -it is still my mouth o p e n-    ; andthet sheep c o m e out   from ; D a r k e n e d;  space ; of my E Y e-  , in the picTURE..  ; O N  t  O;   M y     F   A    C   e. -has s a i d  "S h a k e s p e a re .."-   - this w a s an  O p i n i ON to Shake sphare -  h e r e..

D i d  Picasso,   go   f o r w a r d;  into,  this field..w e have to " turn "  picaso's  W o r k s  to find  SO..


Yorum Gönder